Problem of Teenage Pregnancy

Over the past few days immatureage gestation computes withstand grown substantially. More than one cardinal teenagers will become pregnant this course of instruction in Canada, and the number is growing. some(prenominal) socioeconomic factors influence pregnancy esteems, such as different races, different religions, financial status, precept and family background. A nonher influence is the sexual learning children ar receiving or non receiving at school and at home. While the puzzle of teenage pregnancy is ac distinguishledged, solutions argon attack slowly.Some p arents feel that pregnancy is a result of the deprivation of sex direction courses taught in schools, while some others feel that these courses contain up encouraging teenagers to become sexually active. Studies keep been done to find start just how important sex pedagogics courses are, and what found they set about on pregnancy rates. The amount of sex didactics they mystify is not as important a factor, according to a new study. (Fewer girls jerk off pregnant when involved in community, E8) Toronto Sun, 1998) other(a) sources say Sex learning courses, advocated to close out teen pregnancy but denounced as encouraged sexual interest, appear to ingest little or no perfume on teens sexual activity. Such courses too have no noticeable effect on contraceptive use and pregnancy rates among teenagers. It was found that while students do learn about sex and contraception, they do not appear to alter their behavior. (Okie, 1996) The courses that are offered in schools have proven not to have any influence on the teenage pregnancy rates.The reason for this whitethorn be that the courses are just not being taught goodly or are targeting the wrong age group two major goals of the school sex education programs are to reduce the incidence of unjustifiable pregnancy as well as the rates of AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases. However, to be effective, programs must u ndertake early. If we wait until an age when most adolescents are sexually active, we might have to attack an acquired behavioral pattern of ineffective STD/pregnancy prevention behavior.Some statistics found that in the 1984 survey of school superintendents found that children do not all seem to know what we expect them to know. It was found that 50% of schools offered a family life education program. Whereas 87% of urban districts had a program, only 25% of hoidenish districts had a program. Canadian school children ages 9, 12 and 15 showed a considerable lack of sexual education. Only 35% of chump 7 students knew that is was possible for a girl to get pregnant between the ages of 12 and 15.Most thought pregnancy could not occur until after age 16. (Herold, 1997) with many studies it has been proven that sex education in schools has little or no noticeable effect on the teen pregnancy rate. The conclusion has been made that the rate of teenage pregnancy is rising slope, but in that location is no solution in sight. Many thought having sex education in the schools would reduce the rate but statistics have suggested that they will not. There have been suggestions of other ways of reducing the high rates. sexual counseling and access to prevention (Beard, 1992) could be tried.In the mid-1970s the Ontario government started to pull up stakes universal access to publicly funded family proviso and sex education. (Beard, 1992) If these were used in junto with school sexuality education it has been predicted that a decrease in the pregnancy rate would occur. Changes in the social climate, (MacDonald, 1996), which teenagers have been exposed to have been linked with rising adolescent pregnancy rates. These forces must be understood if we are to avoid to patent pitfalls, draw successfully on our traditional social and cultural strengths, and design effective models of prevention.